AT&T IPv6 Res support

[David Forrest]

An interesting thread from September discussed a bunch of ISP security
procedures:
http://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/2016-September/011047.html

I think I'll have to just bridge the AT&T router to get "net neutrality".
And I don't want to either but not much available here in St. Louis.

Amicalement,
Dave
--
Maple Park Development
Linux Systems Integration
http://www.maplepark.com/

If IP addresses weighed one gram each:
 IPv4 = half the Empire State Building vs.  IPv6 = 56 billion earths

I use Linux and I wouldn't touch Outlook even if I were using a Hazmat suit
and an isolation lab kit.

On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht <
wolfgang.rupprecht at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Brandon Ewing <brandon.ewing at warningg.com> writes:
> > I am able to ping6 from my home PC to all remote servers.  I am unable to
> > ping6 from remote servers to my home PC.  From my home gateway's config
> > screen I have disabled the packet filter, and from the firewall advanced
> > screen, I have ensured that the reflexive ACL is disabled, which SHOULD
> > allow inbound packets regardless of state settings.
>
> Are you sure the ISP isn't blocking all incoming connections with a
> second set of hidden filters?   I see the same thing on a friend's
> Comcast provided modem.   Even with the user accessible firewall
> disabled incoming ipv6 connections simply never show up on the lan.
> Outgoing connections work fine.
>
> -wolfgang
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20161103/7d67263b/attachment.htm>