v6 naming and shaming - *.europa.eu

Mikael Abrahamsson swmike at swm.pp.se
Wed May 18 16:29:42 CEST 2016


On Wed, 18 May 2016, Phil Mayers wrote:

>
> Ok so basically, if more/most access networks were IPv6-enabled (because 
> big or vital providers are IPv6 only) then all service networks would 
> have to get it working?

Yes, if it's broken from one network but works from the rest, then the 
problem to fix is for that broken network.

If it's broken for everybody, then it's the one who has the broken end 
that needs to fix.

This is the same thing with IPv6, DNSSEC and all such new technologies. If 
there is only one ISP that does DNSSEC validation and it's broken because 
the zone is signed wrong, then that ISP gets blamed. In Sweden, where 85% 
of customers sit behind a DNSSEC validating resolver, nobody gets away 
with screwing up their zone signing because now it's their problem.

It's all about critical mass.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se



More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list