v6 naming and shaming - *.europa.eu
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Wed May 18 16:29:42 CEST 2016
On Wed, 18 May 2016, Phil Mayers wrote:
>
> Ok so basically, if more/most access networks were IPv6-enabled (because
> big or vital providers are IPv6 only) then all service networks would
> have to get it working?
Yes, if it's broken from one network but works from the rest, then the
problem to fix is for that broken network.
If it's broken for everybody, then it's the one who has the broken end
that needs to fix.
This is the same thing with IPv6, DNSSEC and all such new technologies. If
there is only one ISP that does DNSSEC validation and it's broken because
the zone is signed wrong, then that ISP gets blamed. In Sweden, where 85%
of customers sit behind a DNSSEC validating resolver, nobody gets away
with screwing up their zone signing because now it's their problem.
It's all about critical mass.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list