Why do we still need IPv4 when we are migrating to IPv6...

[Olaf.Bonness at telekom.de]

Nice to hear that you feel like that ;-).
However I’ve often got another impression. But may be that is a subjective experience.

From: Lorenzo Colitti [mailto:lorenzo at google.com]
Sent: Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2015 23:05
To: Bonneß, Olaf
Cc: Gert Doering; Ragnar Anfinsen; Steinar Gunderson; IPv6 Ops list
Subject: Re: Why do we still need IPv4 when we are migrating to IPv6...

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:33 AM, <Olaf.Bonness at telekom.de<mailto:Olaf.Bonness at telekom.de>> wrote:
I wonder if it would make a difference if big eyeballs ISPs ("among the
3 largest in a country") would start talking to content providers, telling them "hey, you know, your content is quite popular with our users, but since it's v4-only, we need to seriously throttle it to avoid overloading our CGN.  v6 goes unlimited, btw."...

just dreaming...

[Obo]: Nice idea :). However content is king and your customer hotline will turn red because of people blaming you as ISP.

That's not true. ISPs shake down content companies all the time - look at Comcast vs. Netflix, for example. I'm sure that as a large DT does its share of that kind of thing too :-)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20150213/98999f58/attachment.htm>