Question about IPAM tools for v6

[Erik Kline]

On 31 January 2014 04:21, Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote:
> On 29/01/2014 22:19, Cricket Liu wrote:
>> Consensus around here is that we support DHCPv6 for non-/64 subnets
>> (particularly in the context of Prefix Delegation), but the immediate
>> next question is "Why would you need that?"
>
> /64 netmask opens up nd cache exhaustion as a DoS vector.

Not if you route a /64 to each host (the way 3GPP/LTE does for mobiles).  :-)