PTR records for IPv6

Lorenzo Colitti lorenzo at google.com
Mon Sep 2 03:16:20 CEST 2013


On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 10:14 AM, David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> wrote:

> I see some value in requiring PTRs for some well-know service, but I don't
> see value in a general requirement that all IPv6 addresses have a PTR.
>  Which would basically require the use of wildcard PTRs.
>

But in a word where multiple actors shame the same IPv4 address, a PTR is
already a wildcard. Should we get rid of PTRs for IPv4 as well then?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20130902/349d64fa/attachment.htm>


More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list