PTR records for IPv6

[Lorenzo Colitti]

On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 8:46 AM, David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> wrote:

> However, in IPv4 some have required PTRs even on client and essentially
> every IPv4 address used on the Internet.  I think this has little value and
> would most definitely be a case of "we did it for v4 so it must be right
> for v6", not to mention the fact that /64 for all practical purposes is
> innumerable.
>

What's wrong with wildcard PTRs?

*.e.f.a.c.8.b.d.0.1.0.0.2 IN PTR customer-cafe.isp.net.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20130902/23877e25/attachment.htm>