'Upgrading' NAT64 to 464XLAT?

[Lorenzo Colitti]

On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Marco Sommani <marco.sommani at iit.cnr.it>wrote:

> Well, I understand that there is value in moving towards an IPv6-only
> backbone, but, even in that case, I find it safer to provide IPv4 via
> DS-Lite rather than via 464xLAT. In my view, translating between different
> IP versions can only produce more problems.
>

Agreed. Actually, what you want is MAP-E. Unfortunately, in 3GPP networks,
the encapsulation used by MAP-E breaks DPI mechanisms that many operators
use for billing.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20131126/58053fba/attachment.htm>