'Upgrading' NAT64 to 464XLAT?

[Lorenzo Colitti]

On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Doug Barton <dougb at dougbarton.us> wrote:

> What I'm trying to point out here is that we've got NAT64/DNS64 sitting
> out there for well-meaning folks to stumble into with no idea that it's
> neither a thorough nor a robust solution. If 464xlat is the right answer to
> that particular problem then its proponents need to get to work on the
> HOWTOs.
>

http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6877
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20131126/1b337d88/attachment.htm>