'Upgrading' NAT64 to 464XLAT?

[Lorenzo Colitti]

On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Doug Barton <dougb at dougbarton.us> wrote:

>
>> Wait, what? The problem you describe is the one that 464xlat solves.
>>
>
> Didn't you just make my case? DNS64 didn't solve the problem, at best you
> can say it laid the groundwork for the (arguably) more thorough and
> (unarguably) dramatically more complex solution of 464xlat. And what was
> the delay between them?
>

Are you suggesting that we should have designed 464xlat on day one instead
of DNS64? That's a bit like saying that we should have designed fiber
optics without having copper. If DNS64 had not been designed and
implemented we wouldn't have 464xlat today.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20131126/87b04d00/attachment.htm>