'Upgrading' NAT64 to 464XLAT?

[Lorenzo Colitti]

On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:36 AM, Doug Barton <dougb at dougbarton.us> wrote:

> DNS64 was a non-starter because there are always going to be IPv4 sites
> that hard-code IP addresses, and a non-trivial number of them are going to
> be critical sites for any given set of users. The authors chose to plunge
> ahead anyway, leaving us with yet another transition technology "cure" that
> is worse than the disease.
>

Wait, what? The problem you describe is the one that 464xlat solves.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20131126/eca8f8af/attachment.htm>