end user assignment best practice
Ron Vachiyer
proutfoo at outlook.com
Tue Mar 19 01:27:45 CET 2013
> I see how this false sense of entitlement by the ISP may pose an
> operational problem. :)
Hmm, wow this chat is taking an interesting turn ;)
Thanks for your comments folks. I guess its still a matter of discussion. Would it be considered a false sense of entitlement for the ISP to number the provided device in IPv4 using the first IP of the network? Arguably if in IPv6 the ISP should not use a /64 out of the customer prefix for his edge device, the ISP should also route a second /30 to number his devices and route the IPv4 subnet to customer equipment as well?
Ron.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20130318/1d91d6f3/attachment.htm>
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list