end user assignment best practice

[Pim van Pelt]

2013/3/18 Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl>:
> Hi,
>
>> Is it acceptable practice to number the "LAN" interface using a /64 taken from the /48 assigned for the customer, or is it current practice to use a second /64 outside of the /48 to route the /48 to customer equipment?  In other words, in a scenario such as this, are we to provide [/64 + /64 + /48] or [/64 + (/48 - /64)] to the end site?
>
> Taking one /64 from the /48 of the end user might interfere with their addressing plan, internal aggregation etc. It really depends on the kind of customers you have, but it's something to keep in ming.
On the other hand though, one might say that if the /48 is the
customer's assignment, that they have to provide the transit network,
right? Then one /48 with the /64 taken from that is acceptable IMO.


groet,
Pim
-- 
Pim van Pelt <pim at ipng.nl>
PBVP1-RIPE - http://www.ipng.nl/