end user assignment best practice

[Lorenzo Colitti]

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Ron Vachiyer <proutfoo at outlook.com> wrote:

> Is it acceptable practice to number the "LAN" interface using a /64 taken
> from the /48 assigned for the customer, or is it current practice to use a
> second /64 outside of the /48 to route the /48 to customer equipment?  In
> other words, in a scenario such as this, are we to provide [/64 + /64 +
> /48] or [/64 + (/48 - /64)] to the end site?
>
> Thanks for any input or RTFM material on the subject,
>

You could RTFM RFC 6603, which is intended to be used in this scenario. Not
sure how many clients support it. I personally think it's reasonable to
reserve one of the 65536 /64s to number the connection, but that's just me.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20130318/7492cd63/attachment.htm>