Dual stack statistics?
Brzozowski, John Jason
jjmb at jjmb.com
Sat Mar 2 14:24:55 CET 2013
As Mr, Kline mentioned we see a average of ~20% where we take samples.
This has gone as high as ~40%. I am trying to get more data in a more
automated fashion.
What we believe needs to happen to see greater traffic is CE manufacturers
need to introduce support for IPv6 which is coming. Specifically Smart
TVs, game consoles, etc. I have made progress with the TV folks, however,
game console folks are no where to be found.
Anyone from game console land out there on this list?
John
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Phil Mayers <p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk> wrote:
> On 03/01/2013 09:34 PM, Alan Batie wrote:
>
>> On 2/27/13 12:56 PM, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
>>
>>> I had a quick look at this month's accounting data from a bras (around
>>> 4k dual-stack users) and here are some more numbers:
>>>
>>> IPv4/IPv6 upload: 98%/2%
>>> IPv4/IPv6 download: 93%/7%
>>>
>>
>> Granted, it's only one data point, but fwiw this actually matches what
>> I'm seeing on my own home connection: about 8% ipv6.
>>
>>
>>
> We're a dual-stack university site (>20k users, >20k device on-net), and
> we see similar values despite completely dfferent technology - ~7% IPv6
> during working hours; it's roughly that value whether you count by packets,
> bytes or flows.
>
> Most of it seems to be Youtube.
>
> Maybe ~6-8% represents the magic value for IMIX IPv6 at the present time?
>
> However, one of our research groups is, as I type, doing about 200Mbit/sec
> over IPv6, which has bumped us up to ~16% IPv6. This is mostly datagrid
> traffic to other v6-enabled research peer sites.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20130302/3c13945e/attachment.htm>
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list