6to4 status (again)

[Brzozowski, John Jason]

This would be ideal.


On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Ole Troan <ot at cisco.com> wrote:

> John,
>
> > Ole we actually have experience that tells us it would be bad if we
> turned our relays.  Some streaming service experience is already not
> optimal over 6to4 using our relays largely related to the protocol not the
> relays themselves.  Turning ours down would result in the use of a single
> 6to4 relay on someone else's network.  Further this relay is hosted by a
> university.  For now we think it makes more sense to keep our running and
> encourage client side disablement until there is ~0 bits over 6to4.
>
> yep, I understand the choice and what bind you're in.
> my hope was that everyone, including the university would stop their 6to4
> public relays.
>
> cheers,
> Ole
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20130301/2c31cf0e/attachment.htm>