6to4 status (again)

[Brzozowski, John Jason]

No, still investigating since the services are dual stack.  Stay tuned.


On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 06:57:02AM -0500, Brzozowski, John Jason wrote:
> > Ole we actually have experience that tells us it would be bad if we
> turned
> > our relays.  Some streaming service experience is already not optimal
> over
> > 6to4 using our relays largely related to the protocol not the relays
> > themselves.  Turning ours down would result in the use of a single 6to4
> > relay on someone else's network.  Further this relay is hosted by a
> > university.  For now we think it makes more sense to keep our running and
> > encourage client side disablement until there is ~0 bits over 6to4.
>
> Do you know why your clients are using 6to4 to access "some streaming
> service" in the first place?  If they only have IPv4 and 6to4, they should
> not use IPv6.
>
> Gert Doering
>         -- NetMaster
> --
> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>
> SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
> D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20130301/f9379cf8/attachment.htm>