teredo.ipv6.microsoft.com off?

Marco Sommani marco.sommani at iit.cnr.it
Fri Jul 19 10:30:13 CEST 2013


On 18/lug/2013, at 22:09, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com> wrote:

> Wait... I had the impression that iff there was no other IPv6 connectivity,
> Teredo was used in older Windows because of the generic "prefer IPv6" rule.
> The default RFC 3484 table covers 6to4 but not Teredo.
> 
> Recent Windows deprefs Teredo of course.
> 
>   Brian

Right. The policy table in RFC 3484 has no specific entry for prefix 2001::/32. This is corrected in the table of RFC 6724:

      Prefix        Precedence Label
      ::1/128               50     0
      ::/0                  40     1
      ::ffff:0:0/96         35     4
      2002::/16             30     2
      2001::/32              5     5
      fc00::/7               3    13
      ::/96                  1     3
      fec0::/10              1    11
      3ffe::/16              1    12

-- 
Marco Sommani
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
Istituto di Informatica e Telematica
Via Giuseppe Moruzzi 1
56124 Pisa - Italia
work: +390506212127
mobile: +393487981019 
fax: +390503158327
mailto:marco.sommani at iit.cnr.it

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5466 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20130719/38a22c1a/attachment.p7s>


More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list