teredo.ipv6.microsoft.com off?
Marco Sommani
marco.sommani at iit.cnr.it
Fri Jul 19 10:30:13 CEST 2013
On 18/lug/2013, at 22:09, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com> wrote:
> Wait... I had the impression that iff there was no other IPv6 connectivity,
> Teredo was used in older Windows because of the generic "prefer IPv6" rule.
> The default RFC 3484 table covers 6to4 but not Teredo.
>
> Recent Windows deprefs Teredo of course.
>
> Brian
Right. The policy table in RFC 3484 has no specific entry for prefix 2001::/32. This is corrected in the table of RFC 6724:
Prefix Precedence Label
::1/128 50 0
::/0 40 1
::ffff:0:0/96 35 4
2002::/16 30 2
2001::/32 5 5
fc00::/7 3 13
::/96 1 3
fec0::/10 1 11
3ffe::/16 1 12
--
Marco Sommani
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
Istituto di Informatica e Telematica
Via Giuseppe Moruzzi 1
56124 Pisa - Italia
work: +390506212127
mobile: +393487981019
fax: +390503158327
mailto:marco.sommani at iit.cnr.it
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5466 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20130719/38a22c1a/attachment.p7s>
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list