teredo.ipv6.microsoft.com off?

[Ron Broersma]

On Jul 16, 2013, at 10:40 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:

> On Tue, 16 Jul 2013, Christopher Palmer wrote:
> 
>> If there is feedback on the ongoing experiment or our consideration of sunsetting Teredo, do let me know.
>> 
>> So far people have been quite enthusiastic.
> 
> I am too. I would really like to see 6to4 and teredo be default off everywhere, and people who want it can manually turn it on. If teredo went away completely, that would also be a good thing.

Strongly concur here as well.  One less thing I have to disable on all my systems in enterprise nets.  Also hoping 6to4 can be phased out.  And (someday) all the flavors of happy eyeballs.  Too many automatic mechanism trying to "help", adds complexity, and makes the network behavior more non-deterministic, which is making it increasingly painful to diagnose operational issues in heterogeneous dual-stack enterprise networks.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6127 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20130717/ea90eec5/attachment.p7s>