6to4 status (again)

Keith Moore moore at network-heretics.com
Thu Feb 28 03:27:24 CET 2013



Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 27, 2013, at 7:30 PM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo at google.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 5:30 AM, Christopher Palmer <Christopher.Palmer at microsoft.com> wrote:
>> 2.       The majority of home users don’t have routers that support UPnP management of NAT/FW openings, at least from our telemetry.
>> 
> 
> Amen. 

In the routers I've seen, it is off by default.  But I'm not sure what this has to do with 6to4, since last I knew UPnP didn't support opening arbitrary IP protocol types.  Or did it get extended?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20130227/16de7f60/attachment.htm>


More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list