6to4 status (again)
Keith Moore
moore at network-heretics.com
Thu Feb 28 03:27:24 CET 2013
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 27, 2013, at 7:30 PM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo at google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 5:30 AM, Christopher Palmer <Christopher.Palmer at microsoft.com> wrote:
>> 2. The majority of home users don’t have routers that support UPnP management of NAT/FW openings, at least from our telemetry.
>>
>
> Amen.
In the routers I've seen, it is off by default. But I'm not sure what this has to do with 6to4, since last I knew UPnP didn't support opening arbitrary IP protocol types. Or did it get extended?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20130227/16de7f60/attachment.htm>
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list