6to4 status (again)

[Lorenzo Colitti]

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com> wrote:

> >> Suppose operators take the position that they don't want to upgrade the
> >> relays because most of the traffic on them comes from third party
> >> networks, and thus #1 is infeasible. What then?
>
> Figure out how widely the route to 192.88.99.1 is advertised,
> which will tell you who is able to use the relay. It is strongly
> in a relay operator's interest to limit the advertisement of
> that route to networks that are welcome to use the relay.
>

Sure. And the 6to4 service in networks that don't do that gets worse. You
can't get there from here.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20130226/43857b67/attachment.htm>