Monitoring IPv6-MAC mappings

Phil Mayers p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk
Wed Apr 3 18:01:08 CEST 2013


On 03/04/13 16:41, Fernando Gont wrote:
> On 04/03/2013 12:27 PM, Phil Mayers wrote:
>> On 02/04/13 14:39, Phil Mayers wrote:
>>
>>> optional!) and what products would people suggest / are people using?
>>> Bonus points for sensible handling of link-local addresses and subnets
>>> with >1 router.
>>
>> So it's interesting how many of the suggestions are "packet capture"
>> based, which of course requires access to the subnet layer2. My gut
>> feeling is that this is unworkable in a lot of enterprise networks - do
>> people concur?
>
> What do you mean by "packet capture"-based? That the interface must be
> put nto promiscuous mode? Something else?

That they work by listening for ND packets, which means they must be 
able to listen on each layer2 you want to monitor.



More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list