CloudFlare IPv6 BGP announcements - WTF guys?
Daniel Roesen
dr at cluenet.de
Mon Jul 16 21:15:17 CEST 2012
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 03:45:43PM +0200, Oliver wrote:
> The whole thing is daft; even if you've got multiple upstreams, there's still
> *nothing* preventing you from exposing only your /32 to the rest of the
> internet and tagging more specifics with NO_EXPORT to each of your upstreams.
Not having a backbone pretty effectively does.
> If your modus operandi is to pollute the routing tables, you deserve all the
> unreachability you get.
Wether you see /32 PA more-specifics from all the CDN nodes, or PI /48s
doesn't make a difference at all, technically.
Best regards,
Daniel
--
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list