1::1/128 + 2::2/128 - GRH Anomalies Delta (2012-08-17)

[Jeroen Massar]

On 2012-08-17 13:28, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
> 
>> While that is true, 1::1 and 2::2 should never exist anywhere, they
>> are outside of 2000::/3 and thus are not defined and thus should
>> not be used and definitely never ever be routed on the Internet.
>> Same for that silly 64:ff9b::/96 prefix.
> 
> Jeroen, I am sure that you know that 64:ff9b::/96 is the 'official'
> prefix for NAT64 RFC 6052.

No, I did not... and now I do, thanks.

It is oddly enough not registered in:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-ipv6-special-registry/iana-ipv6-special-registry.xml

> It does not really change your conclusion
> anyway since this prefix should be kept within an AS

The NAT64 prefix from just a few moments ago will pop up as such now in GRH.

Greets,
 Jeroen

(off to find time to once and for all optimize GRH so that it is speedy
again...)