IPV6 route registries

[Matthew Huff]

Both solutions can end up with inconsistencies. We have had providers update other registries as a proxy for us with only their info, creating problems.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Hilliard [mailto:nick at foobar.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 1:42 PM
> To: Jeroen Massar
> Cc: Matthew Huff; 'ipv6-ops at lists.cluenet.de'
> Subject: Re: IPV6 route registries
> 
> On 13/09/2011 17:29, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> > You should register your routes in as many places as possible, primary
> > candidates: ARIN RPSL[1], RIPE and RADB.
> 
> no, don't.  register in one place, and it will probably be propagated to
> RADB anyway.  Multiple registrations all over the place are the bane of
> IRRDBs, because they end up giving inconsistent results when people
> inevitably forget to update one, or the other.
> 
> Nick