Switches Juniper
sthaug at nethelp.no
sthaug at nethelp.no
Tue Oct 18 19:49:37 CEST 2011
> >> We've got an m7i that we can't do IPv6 tunneling on because that's a
> >> 'extra feature' and not only requires a special board but extra license.
> >
> > Eh? We've done this on M7i for years. Static IPv6 in IP or IPv6 in GRE
> > tunnels, no problem. No license required either. M7i has the necessary
> > tunnel "PIC" as a builtin feature.
>
> But can yours do a sit/6in4 tunnel like what is used to do v6 tunneling
> from say, tunnelbroker.net? That, as far as we've been able to find,
> require the PIC to do it.
Possibly. Notice I said *static*. That means something like the
following:
interfaces {
ip-1/2/0 {
unit 10 {
tunnel {
source a.b.c.d;
destination w.x.y.z;
}
family inet6 {
address 2001:8c0:pqrs::1/64;
}
}
}
}
This is a statically configured IPv6 in IPv4 tunnel, using the tunnel
PIC available on all M7i routers.
> I can only go based on what the person who was setting this up saw and
> experienced - and the fact no matter how hard we tried, couldn't get the
> tunnels to come up on the m7i - even after following multiple examples
> and even the instructions directly off tunnelbroker.net.
Here is one set of instructions I found on
http://www.tunnelbroker.net/forums/index.php?topic=21.0
which shows a IPv6 in GRE tunnel, instead of the IPv6 in IP tunnel I
showed above. As long as you only need static configurations, the M7i
will do this just fine, using the built in tunnel PIC.
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list