Switches Juniper

[Paul Stewart]

Just to clarify though - you can do dual-stack without tunneling no problem
without a license.

Yes, the EX license thing is just plain dumb - agree fully with that... :)

Paul


-----Original Message-----
From: ipv6-ops-bounces+paul=paulstewart.org at lists.cluenet.de
[mailto:ipv6-ops-bounces+paul=paulstewart.org at lists.cluenet.de] On Behalf Of
Brielle Bruns
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 12:10 PM
To: ipv6-ops at lists.cluenet.de
Subject: Re: Switches Juniper

On 10/18/11 7:38 AM, Arturo Servin wrote:
> I was going to to buy some juniper switches (ERX3200) but Juniper 
> sales representative told to my local distributor that IPv6 requires a 
> "special licence" and to pay more. They also wanted the list of 
> "protocols" that we require to run IPv6 (I just forwarded them the 
> list that they have in its own brochure 
> -http://www.juniper.net/us/en/local/pdf/datasheets/1000216-en.pdf
> -)
>
> Before going and buying Cisco or any other brand I wanted to ask the 
> list if you have had a recent experience on this type with Juniper and 
> if this is really true or just another sales person without clue about 
> v6.
>
> I do not mind to pay more for licences with special features or to pay 
> more for better software, I just find hilarious from Juniper to treat 
> IPv6 as "special".


We've got an m7i that we can't do IPv6 tunneling on because that's a 'extra
feature' and not only requires a special board but extra license. 
  Pretty much made sure I won't be using juniper products instead of
Foundry/Brocade or Cisco.

It's beyond absurd.  Even my ancient cisco 2600s can do v6 tunneling and
functionality with a v6 image and without needing a special board.


-- 
Brielle Bruns
The Summit Open Source Development Group
http://www.sosdg.org    /     http://www.ahbl.org