yum IPv6 repos

[Doug Barton]

On 12/26/2011 17:43, Cameron Byrne wrote:
> The fact is,

Facts? You mean your speculation. Calling your speculation a fact
doesn't make it any more so.

> IPv4 is effectively exhausted from the perspective of
> planning any large scale strategic initiative.

The carriers that are pushing CGN disagree with you. Not to mention that
"typical" NAT setups today at the end-user network level only require 1
IPv4 address. We're going to see IPv4 continue to exist for a very long
time.

That's not to say that IPv6 isn't a better choice, only that we need to
be realistic about the landscape.

-- 

		[^L]

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/