mail filtering based on reverse DNS

[Marco d'Itri]

On Aug 10, Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios at cs.uni-bonn.de> wrote:

> In the modern days, where often a lot of services *with their own
> domain names* run on big server machines, it is unreasonable to require
> that forward and reverse resolving agree. (The SPF stuff might be 
I call bullshit on this.

> Requiring any PTR might be ok.
Requiring any PTR is useless, and this is why nobody bothers.

-- 
ciao,
Marco
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20110810/a77e79b9/attachment.sig>