Operational challenges of no NAT

[Simon Huggins]

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:13:16AM +0100, Matthew Ford wrote:
> On 28 Oct 2010, at 11:06, Mark Blackman wrote:
> > Is there some documented list of the usual requirements that NAT is
> > used to satisfy and the corresponding IPv6 method to satisfy that
> > requirement?
> See http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4864

I read this a while back and got excited by section 4.4 (topology
hiding) which is similar to what I need for keeping one egress IP for
many servers (see posts from mid September here) but it then goes very
hand-wavy and doesn't actually get what we would need.

-- 
Simon  [ huggie at earth.li ] *\       "How should I know if it works?  \**
****** ]-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-[ **\   That's what beta testers are for. I  \*
****** [  Htag.pl 0.0.24 ] ***\       only coded it" - Linus Torvalds  \