Linux source address selection vs. EUI-64
Frank Bulk
frnkblk at iname.com
Sat Nov 13 20:35:48 CET 2010
If in the physical world a network administrator would assign a /64 per
network segment (the prefix shouldn't be longer) for one or more servers or
workstations in a broadcast domain, then it should hold that each customer
in a virtual environment should have at least a /64, no smaller, for 1 to n
servers.
For all the customers in a virtual environment to share one /64 and then use
a /96 out of it for their own address space suggests that the hosting
provider is still thinking in IPv4 terms.
These providers all give a /64 per customer:
http://www.rapidxen.net/plans
http://www.hostgatorcouponcodex.com/blog/free-vps-with-ipv6/
http://bitfolk.com/
Frank
-----Original Message-----
From: ipv6-ops-bounces+frnkblk=iname.com at lists.cluenet.de
[mailto:ipv6-ops-bounces+frnkblk=iname.com at lists.cluenet.de] On Behalf Of
Eugen Leitl
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010 9:32 AM
To: ipv6-ops at lists.cluenet.de
Subject: Re: Linux source address selection vs. EUI-64
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 03:36:57PM +0100, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> For individual hosts (esp. in a VPS environment), assigning a /64 or
> larger makes little sense to me, a /96 is more than enough.
Is that an official recommendation? I currently have a single /56,
which I would like to distribute over several thousands customers,
each on a virtual server, with currently one static IPv4 address.
I can see how a /96 for each customer would be more than enough
(especially that since hundreds of customers are going to share
the same MAC, due to the low-overhead virtualization technology
used).
Presumably, in above context it would be a sane thing to parcel
the /56 into /64, each for one physical server's distinct NIC
MAC, and from each /64 a /96 for each virtual server?
--
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list