Operational challenges of no NAT

[Cameron Byrne]

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Mateusz Blaszczyk <blahu77 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Cameron,
>
>
> On 29 October 2010 21:06, Cameron Byrne <cb.list6 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Which leaves well meaning people attempting to find, universally
>> described as non-ideal, technology solutions to deploy IPv6 over
>> IPv4-only CPE / UE
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kuarsingh-v6ops-6to4-provider-managed-tunnel-00#section-2
>>
>
> My network (as it is at the moment) could benefit from such 6to4
> NAT66'ed access method.
> Is it something you have seen working? Or was it just a pointer to
> show to was lengths ppl are forced to get v6 running?
>

Just a pointer to how the CPE  / UE is a blocking issue for some folks
to get IPv6, and thus they have to do hacks to make IPv6 works.  In
the case of this draft, 6to4 is hack, and thus PMT is a hack of a
hack.

Cameron

>>
>> Cameron
>>
>
> -mat
>