RFC3069 example setup for Cisco

[Jon]

Hi

Yes, i have used this but never needed the static routes.
Just ip unnumbered and local-proxy-arp was needed on a 6500/sup720/SX something
Need to test this with IPv6 as well

Jon Harald Bovre

Sent from my iPad

On 1. nov. 2010, at 05.44, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at swm.pp.se> wrote:

> 
> Got a few requests to provide RFC3069-style config for cisco, so here it is:
> 
> int lo1
> ip address 192.168.100.1 255.255.255.0
> 
> int vlan100
> ip address unnumbered lo1
> ip local-proxy-arp
> int vlan101
> ip address unnumbered lo1
> ip local-proxy-arp
> int vlan101
> ip address unnumbered lo1
> ip local-proxy-arp
> 
> ip route 192.168.100.2 vlan 100
> ip route 192.168.100.3 vlan 101
> ip route 192.168.100.4 vlan 102
> 
> Provides L2 separation for customers but still use a single IP subnet.
> 
> Additional link:
> 
> http://blog.ioshints.info/2010/02/unnumbered-ethernet-vlan-interfaces.html
> 
> -- 
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se