XS4ALL Introduces native IPv6 for DSL customers
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Fri Aug 27 10:52:31 CEST 2010
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:38:19AM +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:21:33AM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> > > Unless you run out of /48s and have to go back to RIPE NCC to get more
> > > address space. And then you're judged on /56s, not /48s for efficiency.
> >
> > An /48 assigned counts as "all the /56s in there are assigned".
>
> Yes, that's the problem. For just one customer.
What's the *problem* here? If you hand out your /32 in chunks of /48s
to your customers, and the /32 is full, it is *full* - and you're entitled
to get more space.
So why is this considered a problem?
(For us, we're likely never going to fill our /32, so it doesn't really
matter what size of block we hand out to customers - and for networks
where this matters, it really should be a matter of having a proper
address plan presented to the RIPE NCC. Now, if the NCC denies a request
based on "we don't do /48s here, assign /56s to your customers!" that
would certainly something to escalate)
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 155817
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list