XS4ALL Introduces native IPv6 for DSL customers
Daniel Roesen
dr at cluenet.de
Fri Aug 27 10:07:47 CEST 2010
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:55:28AM +0200, Marco Hogewoning wrote:
> > Unless you run out of /48s and have to go back to RIPE NCC to get more
> > address space. And then you're judged on /56s, not /48s for efficiency.
>
> No, you are judged on /56 equivalents....the /48 assignment is perfectly valid.
Sure it is, but it's a difference in the amount of customers you can
support, isn't it?
With the old /48 HD ratio 0.80 policy, a /32 was to support a customer
base of 52.429 before you qualified for additional address space. With
the new /56 policy with HD ratio 0.94, RIPE NCC asks for 6.183.533
customers before the /32 allocation is deemed efficiently used.
Is my understanding of the policy wrong?
Best regards,
Daniel
--
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list