IPv6 network policies

[Ole Troan]

Mark,

 [...]

>> yes, we should probably add that requirement. it has passed WG last
>> call, but let me see if we can get it in. do you have proposed text?
> 
> Is there still an opportunity for this?

yes, I believe so. it hasn't gone to the IESG yet.

>> as I said on the list, if you want to change the behaviour of IPv6 to always use ND before communicating to on-link nodes on any type of link, then you need to write a draft. plan to?
>> I would not object to such a solution.
>> 
> 
> I'm happy to if it is necessary. My interpretation though, because I
> can't find any 'special casing' of P2P links in the RFCs, is that that
> is how things are supposed to be. I presume 6man be the best place to
> get a determination on that before I spend time developing a draft?

yep, I also think 6man is the best place.

cheers,
Ole