IPv6 network policies

[Ole Troan]

>> NUD could be done, but on most router to router links it is
>> unnecessary and not used.
>> 
> 
> I suppose this comes down to if you don't agree with (or maybe just
> don't fully understand) the way something works in an RFC, does that
> mean it's ok for you not to implement it the way the RFC says?

good to hear that you are the authority on how RFC4861 should be read (note this may be sarcasm. ;-)).
please point us to the sections in RFC4861 which require an implementation to do address resolution on a link without L2 addresses. and if it is not address resolution, which part of ND are you referring to?

references to the ipng mail archive would also be appreciated.

cheers,
Ole