zero suppression vs compression in addresses

[Daniel Roesen]

On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 07:52:32AM -0500, Drake Wilson wrote:
> > Correct. The double-colon form replaces 1-n 32-bit "words" of zeros.
> 
> 16-bit, no?  E.g., 2001:db8:1122:3344:5566:: uses a trailing
> double-colon for the last 48 bits.

Of course, sorry for confusion. 1-n aligned 16-bit groups.

Best regards,
Daniel

-- 
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0