IPv6 End User Assignments

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 09:13:55AM -0700, Leo Vegoda wrote:
> [...]
> 
> >> And, as the policy states, these are only guidelines.
> >> Some ISPs will need to assign a /47 or /46 per customer because their
> >> business model requires it.
> > 
> > This would require approval from the RIPE NCC if done in the RIPE region.
> > 
> > /48.../64 is something the ISP can choose, but /47 or shorter needs
> > hostmaster approval in every single case.
> 
> But a /47 sub-allocation does not need RIR approval. So the ISP can provide
> a /47 prefix which the customer can assign as two separate /48, one to each
> half of its 'site'.

I would call this "bending the policy".  Even if you do sub-allocations, 
the assignment rule of "maximum of a /48 per site" still holds (and the
NCC is going to ask the LIR questions about this).

Of course, if the customer actually *has* two sites, two /48s would 
obviously be fine.

(And yes, I'm aware that "site" isn't one of the best-defined terms)

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  128645

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20090509/45fc2bec/attachment.sig>