Biggest mistake for IPv6: It's not backwards compatible, developers admit

[John Payne]

On Mar 31, 2009, at 10:52 AM, Mohacsi Janos wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Pierfrancesco Caci wrote:
>> Are you willing to explain to your colleague in finances why you let
>> your traffic with $big_provider_A go over commit at premium price,
>> while traffic with $big_provider_B was under commit? Please note that
>> the colleague in finances is the same that will deny you the upgrades
>> of your router memories at budget time.
>
> okay it seems to me, that shim6 is a good candidate for your problem  
> with some extension allowing specifing amount of outgoing traffic  
> going on paralel links.

How do you then stop all your users configuring their shim6 stacks to  
prefer $big_provider_A because it's "better performing" ?