Biggest mistake for IPv6: It's not backwards compatible, developers admit

[Pierfrancesco Caci]

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 14:05, John Payne <john at sackheads.org> wrote:

> [*]  even if that's "primary/backup" rather than anything more complex...
> but people will want to try to get to 60/40 or 50/50 for political or cost
> reasons
>

and people denying/not acknowledging the need of political/economical
traffic engineering are kindly asked to get their head outside of the
cozy cave that their educational lab network is. ktnxby





-- 
 Pierfrancesco Caci, ik5pvx