IPv6 PI allocation
Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino 2.0
itojun at itojun.org
Thu May 31 06:55:55 CEST 2007
> Anyway, here is my questions in mind after reading the first mail for
> PI allocation.
>
> 1. Is there also a possibility of routing table explosion with IPv6
> due to PI? And do we have to solve the problem with a technical aspect?
>
> 2. The word 排outing registry" is dead? Is there no rule for 2 or
> more prefixes from one AS? Or is there a demand for a good solution
> for transit providers, in stead of "one prefix from one AS"?
>
> 3. Do we need other sophisticated auto aggregation technology for PI
> in routing protocols?
>
> 4. Do we have to be against the size of /48 as PI?
5. are you guys aware of potential growth of routing entries (2^16)
INSIDE your AS (/48)? do you still think it easy enough to handle
IPv6 routing table size with your inexpensive routers?
itojun
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list