BCP for multisite multihoming

Andrew Ruthven andrew.ruthven at catalyst.net.nz
Tue May 22 02:38:00 CEST 2007


On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 13:45 -0700, David Conrad wrote:

> Yep.  A tradeoff.  Obtaining a single /32 and announcing the  
> deaggregates will cost you less, but you run the risk of running into  
> filters.  I do not know how to quantify that risk.

I *am* announcing a /32 and I'm still running into filters.

It would appear that not everyone has noticed that APNIC is allocating
blocks out of 2400::/12.  And this includes ICANN (I can't access
public.icann.org via IPv6).

Cheers!

-- 
Andrew Ruthven, Wellington, New Zealand
At work: andrew.ruthven at catalyst.net.nz
At home: andrew at etc.gen.nz
GPG fpr: 34CA 12A3 C6F8 B156 72C2  D0D7 D286 CE0C 0C62 B791
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20070522/a1ed7990/attachment.sig>


More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list