BCP for multisite multihoming
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Mon May 21 21:46:19 CEST 2007
On 21 May 2007, at 3:28pm, bmanning at karoshi.com wrote:
>>> 4) Obtain multiple /32s, announce one from each POP.
>>>
>> Presumably this company is incorporated in each country in which it
>> has a PoP. It is effectively four companies with a common owner. As
>> such, I think #4 is the right answer and I don't think it should be
>> too difficult to get the address space.
>
> what an egregious waste of numbering resources.
I agree that it is not highly efficient but as A&M activity is quite
likely to break up aggregates in horrific ways anyway, I would prefer
to number a network in a way that is likely to lead to less longer
term deaggregation.
Leo
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list