finish my RFC before posting
Mustafa F. Rana
mfrana at cyber.net.pk
Fri May 18 11:16:24 CEST 2007
Point very well made, Multihoming customers want control over their traffic
- 'at least' nothing less than what's available with IPv4.
----
Mustafa F. Rana
Regional Manager Operations, CYBERNET
-----Original Message-----
From: ipv6-ops-bounces+mfrana=cyber.net.pk at lists.cluenet.de
[mailto:ipv6-ops-bounces+mfrana=cyber.net.pk at lists.cluenet.de] On Behalf Of
Daniel Austin MBCS
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 1:21 PM
To: ipv6-ops at lists.cluenet.de
Subject: Re: finish my RFC before posting
Hi,
Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino 2.0 wrote:
> it is clear that some people are people who did not finish reading
> my RFC3178 - for instance, i have a chapter dedicated to ingress
> filtering (chapter 5) but there's a guy who is attacking me on
ingress
> filtering.
>
> so, for the efficiency of discussion, please do finish reading my
> RFC and then post something about it. ok? this way i will get more
> sleeping time.
We deal with multihoming (in the IPv4 world) customers almost daily, and
I can tell you right now that *none* of the customers I deal with would
even consider using IPv6 if this RFC was the method.
They want multihoming, they want more control of their traffic, they
want more than two transit providers, they want to join IXs without
having to be a LIR.
When it comes to considering IPv6, they want to mirror the reliability
and stability and control that they currently have in IPv4. Many people
are not in a position to become a LIR, but still want full control over
multihoming.
If we want people to be encouraged to use IPv6, we have to work with
them not against them. Several smaller ISPs that we deal with are of
the opinion that IPv6 isn't for them as they can't maintain their
business models, stability and SLAs without the same kind of multihoming
that they have currently.
So, thanks for the RFC - it's an amusing read and some people might even
take note of it like all other RFC's but don't get your hopes up. It's
likely to be passed over like all other RFCs and people will do what the
people want.
Thanks,
--
Daniel Austin MBCS
Managing Director
Kewlio.net Limited
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list