IPv6 PI allocation

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 10:15:11AM -0500, David Conrad wrote:
> >>Well, I think the IPv4 table is completely FUBAR, but for the next  
> >>few
> >>years, IPv6 will profit from it...
> >
> >	yup, indeed.
> 
> IPv6 routes are held on the same boxes that hold IPv4 routes...

Correct, but given the respective table sizes, the safety margin needed
for IPv4 table growth easily covers the IPv6 table...

This might change over time, of course.  My crystal ball is clouded.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  113403

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20070517/a1ee661e/attachment.sig>