And now, for your regularly scheduled dose of broken ipv6 routing...

[Marcin Gondek]

Nick Hilliard napisał(a):
> Oh my!
>
> At least the pktloss is down from an irritating 93% to a more acceptable 16%.
>
>   
 From my side it's look very good (easynet have a nice backbone over ipv6):

==cut==
  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  plwaw-to-lan.edge.pl.ipv6.e-utp.net 
[2001:6f8:93c:b::1]
  2    47 ms    53 ms    47 ms  denun-to-plwaw.core.de.ipv6.e-utp.net 
[2001:6f893c::b]
  3    69 ms    55 ms    53 ms  gw-59.ham-01.de.sixxs.net 
[2001:6f8:900:3a::1]
  4    53 ms    51 ms    52 ms  fe1-0-536.6r0.isham.de.easynet.net 
[2001:6f8:800:1003::209:55]
  5    54 ms    68 ms    54 ms  ge0-0-0-35.br1.isham.de.easynet.net 
[2001:6f8:892:6::1:11]
  6    63 ms    62 ms    62 ms  ge0-3-0-0.br0.ixfra.de.easynet.net 
[2001:6f8:800::51:6:1]
  7    64 ms    60 ms    67 ms  fe1-0.6er0.ixfra.de.easynet.net 
[2001:6f8:888:5::10:40]
  8    67 ms    69 ms    64 ms  de-cix.fra20.ip6.tiscali.net 
[2001:7f8::cb9:0:1]
  9    65 ms    60 ms    65 ms  so-1-0-0.fra40.ip6.tiscali.net 
[2001:668:0:2::4b0]
 10    66 ms    68 ms    72 ms  so-0-0-0.dus11.ip6.tiscali.net 
[2001:668:0:2::1:1]
 11    76 ms    76 ms    77 ms  so-0-0-0.ams22.ip6.tiscali.net 
[2001:668:0:2::1:122]
 12    83 ms   101 ms    90 ms  pos-7-5-0.ams11.ip6.tiscali.net 
[2001:668:0:2::630]
 13    88 ms    89 ms    83 ms  Amsterdam1.ripe.net 
[2001:7f8:1::a500:3333:1]
 14    79 ms    81 ms    80 ms  kite-www.ripe.net [2001:610:240:0:a843::8]
==cut==

-- 
Marcin Gondek
http://drixter.e-utp.net