New ARIN ipv6 allocation policies

[Jeroen Massar]

Andrew Alston wrote:
>> Yes, those academic networks that think they can get by without paid  
>> transit in IPv6 and then dump everything they can't move over peering
> 
>> in those triple-continent tunnels are extremely annoying.
> 
> I just have one question here, what about those places that wish to
> develop, wish to move forward, and have no OPTION but to tunnel

Those comments are not for those situations ;)

The following document describes how one should and should not tunnel:
http://ip6.de.easynet.net/ipv6-minimum-peering.txt

(yes, it dates from 2002, that is when quite a number of operators 
already got smart and had decent IPv6 networks ;)

Greets,
  Jeroen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 311 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20060904/816d3320/attachment.sig>