Global IPv6 policy question

[Tim Chown]

On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 06:20:08PM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 21-jul-2006, at 17:42, Kevin Loch wrote:
> 
> >/12 seems to be rather large given the unlikely possibility of
> >a /13 assignment being made any time soon.  The largest
> >assignments being made so far have been /19, and only
> >two ever.
> 
> >A year's supply of the largest expected assignment size would
> >be a good target.  /16 should be more than enough.
> 
> /12 makes for 512 blocks under 2000::/3 so it doesn't seem too  
> excessive, even if a bit longer would also be sufficient.
> 
> But remember that they were talking about doing /6 or thereabouts so  
> maybe we should count our blessings.  :-)

I guess one other question is whether there is any value in reserving
larger chunks of sequential space for each RIR, whatever is actually
allocated now, should any regional aggregation have any value in the 
future?   i.e. whether to think about where the /16's come from.

-- 
Tim/::1