3-level more-specific leak... sigh
Daniel Roesen
dr at cluenet.de
Tue Dec 26 17:50:51 CET 2006
Hi,
2001:48d0::/32 3549 11537 2153 195
2001:48d0::/33 3549 11537 2153 195
2001:48d0::/34 3549 11537 2153 195
2001:48d0::/35 3549 11537 2153 195
2001:48d0:2000::/35 3549 11537 2153 195
2001:48d0:4000::/34 3549 11537 2153 195
2001:48d0:4000::/35 3549 11537 2153 195
2001:48d0:6000::/35 3549 11537 2153 195
2001:48d0:8000::/33 3549 11537 2153 195
2001:48d0:8000::/34 3549 11537 2153 195
2001:48d0:8000::/35 3549 11537 2153 195
2001:48d0:a000::/35 3549 11537 2153 195
2001:48d0:c000::/34 3549 11537 2153 195
2001:48d0:c000::/35 3549 11537 2153 195
2001:48d0:e000::/35 3549 11537 2153 195
Could folks at 3549, 11537 and 2153 please check their filters?
Those more-specifics should certainly not leak up to 3549 (or farther).
Makes me wonder wether there is any filtering in place at all...
Best regards,
Daniel
--
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list