[narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
Sascha Lenz
slz at baycix.de
Sat Apr 15 21:17:18 CEST 2006
Andrew Alston schrieb:
> Ok, personally so far I think this thread has actually lacked any
> technical arguments, for or against (Not saying that the discussion has
> lacked them, but I definately havent seen them on this thread on this
> list so far).
[...]
> There are other reasons for PI space beyond this of course, but these
> are the major points that come to mind, now, can someone who has a
> logical and technically minded argument AGAINST the PI space, please
> stand up and state the case, rather than these blanket statements that
> PI space kills IPv6 as a decent alternative to IPv4 etc. State the case
> technically, lets hear the technical arguments, instead of a flame war
> that helps no one.
that's just because there _is_ no argument against IPv6 PI which
withstands any real life counter arguments.
The idea behind "no IPv6 PI" is based in the last millenium where there
was a huge problem with the IPv4 Internet routing table size forseeable
indeed.
By that time, i actually understood the idea behing the "no PI" thing
and supported it, but this problem just went away nowerdays (new
routers, more RAM, more CPU/ASIC power...).
I don't need to repeat your arguments about that part, i just agree.
The people who are still behind the idea seem to be either on a personal
crusade or some highly intellectual geeks with more high-level
theoretical skills then real life technical experience
(Sorry if anyone is offended now, be assured it's nothing personal at
all on my end and only a generalisation to keep it short).
I fully support an IPv6 PI Address proposal in general, but i haven't
really looked into the recent proposals in detail up to now, so i can't
say much about the current ones - I'm just happy that there finally is
some policy movement!
Hopefully it swaps over to the other RIR regions, too.
I try to get some time to look into them a little closer, but for now
i'm a bit off-world in the Corparate Network business where IPv6 is
somewhat completely ignored anyways (...the "No IPv6 PI
Multihoming"-issue is one of the reasons for the ignorance there, yes).
..just my 0.02EUR
--
========================================================================
= Sascha Lenz SLZ-RIPE slz at baycix.de =
= Network Operations =
= BayCIX GmbH, Landshut * PGP public Key on demand * =
========================================================================
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list